Usually I am pretty much in agreement with the popularity of the movies or books, and one with the crowd as you would say. Not for me the contrarian views or ‘swimming against the tide’. I am pretty happy to go with the tide.
Which is why, I am now surprised to find myself against the majority opinion in a couple of movies lately.
In the review of Hotel Transylvania, I found myself thinking that it was one of the most hilarious movies of recent times, when the majority opinion was unimpressed. Here, the reverse is true. Everyone says that the movie is creepy, sinister (yes! I know it is the title), and scary. I found it not so great.
Why, you ask? First, I found that the whole premise a bit repetitive and boring. The story is about a crime author- Ellison Oswalt played by Ethan Hawke with of course big glasses because he is a writer – who exposes injustices in previous crimes and the police sloppiness and therefore has turned the entire police department against him already. After a great hit like Kentucky Blood (Hmm an unoriginal title) he has not had a hit in many years and is desparate. He occupies the house where a crime occured, without telling his family that he had done so. So far, original and interesting.
Then it goes into an infinite loop and banalities. He stumbles across a box full of films (Super 8 – Remember those? Of course you don’t!) and watches each episode, which is basically the same movie again and again. A family having fun and enjoying, then suddenly, with no explanation at all, the family being tied up and murdered in different, gruesome ways. The movie is not gory, the gruesomeness implied but not explicit, and therefore in good taste. But the pattern is the same.
This is lazy investigation, right? It is handed to him on a platter. When he investigates further, he finds that in each case there is a sinister, demonic looking presence that exists – subtly, at the corner or just passing by, which is seen only when it is digitized in an Apple computer (what else?) and slowed down or zoomed in or whatever. This journalist also has graphic artist skills – go figure – and can do it all in his home. With the entire village (or at least the police force) against him, whom is he going to ask?
Then it gets even more bizarre and weird. In each case, a child is missing. The incidents have one more thing in common, a symbol that appears in each case. (How else is a lazy writer supposed to figure out what is going on?) The symbol is easily explained by the learned professor Jonas. “Oh that is a pagan demon called Bughuul, and it lives within these images and can come to life by just anyone viewing these images. Too bad.
Combined with inexplicable occurrences like projector coming on by itself in the middle of the night, the children drawing murals on the wall depicting exactly what he saw in the films, it spooks the writer completely. So what do we do? Irrespective of the fact that it is murder evidence, he burns it!
And when it reappears with “extended cut” versions, he is even more spooked. Especially since he has moved away from the house and back to his earlier house.
Now, do you stop watching, knowing all you know? Of course not. Put it on and watch the extended endings. It simply reveals who the murderers were, and makes no sense, but by this time, with a series of unexplained stuff, you hardly notice that it is nonsense.
The wife (Tracy, played by Juliet Rylance) is absurd. She says “Have you again got us staying near a murder location like you have done many times before? Wait, don’t tell me. I am better off not knowing!” What? First, he has moved again to a two horse town to investigate a mystery. Where do you think you were going? And ‘wait, don’t tell me?’. Then why did you ask in an upset tone?
Later when she finds out that she is in the same house “Ellison! What were you thinking?”
The good parts? It has its spooky moments, and yes, Ethan Hawke does a very good job of acting the part. The scenes with the Deputy So-And -So are funny.
But there is so much that is total nonsense or brain dead that I can honestly give this movie only a 3/10
— Krishna