Movie : Malignant


This is one of those movies that draw you in and pack a wallop at the end in terms of a bombshell twist.

For now, I will ignore the initial confusing bit and go straight to the story. The story centres around a woman, Madison Lake Mitchell. She lives with a very abusive husband Derek, who seems to be a kind of a doormat, suffering in silence all his abuses and not leaving him. The story starts when she comes back to him after her pregnancy.

He is drunk and angry about her multiple miscarriages. He gets very aggressive and in anger smashes her head on the wall, drawing blood. When she comes to, she goes back to her room and locks herself in, to protect her unborn child more than to protect herself from Derek. She has a weird dream where an unknown assailant attacks and kills her husband. When she wakes up, she sees that Derek has really been killed and the assailant attacks her, rendering her unconscious.

She wakes up in a hospital where her sister Sydney that she had yet again miscarried, this time probably due to the attacks. Madison reveals a secret to Sydney: She was adopted by their parents when she was eight years old.

Two detectives, Shaw and Moss, investigate Derek’s murder and interview Madison. They discover a photo of young Madison in a Dr Florence Weaver’s house. (This after Madison tells them of a vision she had of the killer who killed her husband bludgeoning Dr Weaver to death). They also learn that Dr Weaver specialized in reconstructive surgery.

Dr Weaver worked with Dr Fields and Dr Gregory. Now Madison has a psychological vision of Dr Fields being killed by the same killer. The killer then calls Madison and tells her that she is Gabriel. Madison reveals this to Shaw and Moss. They talk to Madison’s (adopted) mother as a part of the investigation. She reveals to them that Gregory was the name Madison gave to her imaginary friend but thinks that it could also be someone real that she knew before they adopted her.

Convinced that Madison has the key to the mystery, they ask her and she agrees to be put under hypnosis with the help of a doctor who is an expert in hypnosis. Madison, hypnotized, reveals that her birth name was Elizabeth May and Gabriel almost got her to kill Sydney when she was in their mother’s womb. After Sydney was born, she knew no more of Gabriel.

The killer now kidnaps a woman brazenly from an Underground train and locks her up in a secluded spot that looks like an attic. The woman manages to free herself but while trying to escape, falls from the upper floor and injures herself. Two surprising things come to light. The woman was found in Madison’s attic! So the investigators arrest Madison, suspecting her to be the kidnapper. In addition, the woman turns out to be Serena May, Madison’s birth mother!

There is a fabulous scene when a frightened Madison, in custody, is threatened by the fellow women inmates and she loses consciousness. When she comes to, everyone in the cell except her is dead.

The huge twist comes to light at the end, when Sydney visits the now abandoned hospital where Emily (alias Madison) was treated. In the interests of avoiding spoilers, I will not describe it here. But it explains all and makes the movie just about amazing.

The picturization is great, where Madison freezes and the surroundings change into the places where the killer is when she has these visions.

Just a caveat : I said the twist is perfect, not that it is a practical twist.

Still a very good experience, so go watch it. It is an intelligent horror as only James Wan can produce.

8/10

 – Krishna

Movie: The Pirates – Band of Misfits (2012)


If you like Wallace and Grommit series of ‘claymation’ style animation, you would definitely love this one. It has all the stamp of the silly humour, delightful expressions with the added bonus of having brought it to the digital world. Much of the background and water (sea for instance) are digital with the unmistakable characters in a claymation style. Purists may be aghast but it definitely works for those of us who are in it just for a good time. The story is silly as they all are (for instance Chicken Run by the same group) but keeps a smile constantly on our lips. 

The story timeline is 1837 – (A cute handheld signboard announces it at the beginning and sets the jolly tone for the entire movie)

The story, such as there is, runs like this. The initial scene shows Queen Victoria being treated to almost complete annihilation of her enemies. The French and the Spanish have both been defeated at sea and everything that England surveys is her domain – except for Pirates. In fact, Pirates are the most hated thing in the Queen’s mind. 

Meanwhile the bumbling pirate captain called (no, I’m not kidding) The Pirate Captain runs the seas with his motley and bumbling crew consisting of the following characters – each kind of interesting in their own way as the story develops. The Pirate Captain is voiced by Hugh Grant. 

The crew consists of a number two (Called Number Two or A Pirate With A Scarf), The Albino Pirate, The Pirate With a  Gout and the Surprisingly Curvaceous Pirate (with a bushy beard – you guessed it, it is a girl in disguise but contrary to your expectations, there is no romantic entanglement here). He also has a cute – but slightly fat and therefore unable to fly – parrot. Every pirate needs a parrot, right? It is called – what else? – Polly.

Though inept, he dreams of becoming the Pirate of The Year in the contest held by the Pirate Club every year and when he enters his name, finds that he is outclassed by almost all Top Pirates – Black Bellamy, Cutlass Liz and The Pirate King. He is also laughed out of the room but is determined to get so much wealth by the time of the competition that he simply cannot lose. 

So he puts his heart into ransacking and after a few failures, manages to board a ship. Only to find that this ship is the famous Beagle, and the owner is one Charles Darwin. Disappointed that there were no treasures onboard, only some dead animals, he decides to amuse himself by making Darwin (good ol’ Charles) walk the plank. 

Darwin is resigned to his fate and at the last moment, he looks at Polly and gasps. He tells the Pirate King that Polly is a Dodo, not a parrot – thought to be long extinct! He says that there is a huge honour and award if only the Pirate Captain will lend Polly for the competition to show rare animals – to Queen Victoria!

Not fully trusting Darwin and yet attracted by fame and fortune, the Pirate Captain and the crew go in disguise for the event, much to the chagrin of Charles. Hilarity ensues – a lot of clowning around. 

Finally, Queen Victoria finds out about the Dodo and tries to capture it. When that proves difficult, she offers Pirate Captain a full pardon and immense wealth if only he would hand her Polly for safekeeping. 

When he enters the Pirate Competition, his wealth gets him the Pirate Of The Year trophy but just as he was about to reclaim it, the pirate club discovers that he was pardoned (Pardoned!) by the Queen and so kick him out of the competition and also confiscate all his wealth. 

Now penniless, he is forced to confess to his mates that he no longer has Polly either and they walk away from him, disillusioned. 

He goes back to his dream of selling puppets but cannot forget Polly. He goes to meet her stealthily climbing the walls of the Royal Zoo and finds Polly’s cage empty. A dejected Darwin is nearby, who informs the Captain that Polly is in grave danger of being cooked and eaten by royalty from all over the world, as that is what Victoria likes to do every year. He says that he was also deceived by Victoria and is now fully disillusioned and dejected. 

The rest of the movie is how they do reparations and recover Polly. No, this is not a Spoiler – how else did you think that a movie of this nature will end?

Brilliant to watch, if you like this style of animation and storytelling. Juvenile, if you don’t. 

I belong to the first club and so will award 7/10

= = Krishna

Movie: Gran Torino (2008)


Clint Eastwood’s branch into direction sent him in a different direction from his action Western movie days and he always takes on different subjects that retain interest, and arguably won him a wider audience than his acting.

This movie is also a little different. He shines a spotlight on the Hmong community of Chinese immigrants and what it is to live harmoniously with them.

He plays a gruff old man living alond in a Michigan neighbourhood that is becoming a lot more diverse – in fact, to the point where he is the only white man in the neighnourhood. He is Walt Kowalski, a Polish American who worked and retired from a Ford Assembly plant (this is Michigan, after all). He is also a Korean war veteran, still brutalized by the memories of the everyday horrors and cruelty of war.

He is fearless, has a good workshop in his garage (car assembly association) and guns (war association). The story opens with his wife’s funeral, where he is what he is – gruff and disapproving of everything : his family, whom he considers spoilt, his grand daughter who dresses inappropriately, his entire family which seems to consider this a picnic and does not show due respect to his wife, and even the young priest ‘who is barely out of his diapers’ who is too young to even appreciate the gravity of death.

Interesting characters – before I go on with the story, a few observations. The priest seems to be a very interesting character – Father Janovich, who seems to bear the casual insults in all their conversation with total aplomb. Clint himself goes around the whole movie bitching and grunting – maybe it is his character but to a viewer it seems that he is constantly grumbly. I understand that he is a no nonsense old man – he even shows flashes of humour with his long time barber and friend – but his muttering under his breath sometimes seems to be a bit too much.

The other thing I noticed is that, given all the weighty subjects he has handled as a director, this is fairly lightweight. It is a growing relationship between Mark and his neighbourhood Hmong boy Thao. He meets him first while pointing his gun at Thao when he finds Thao trying to steal his grand and much loved posession, his Grand Torino (car) kept like new with loving care.

He lets him go and then slowly becomes close to Thao and his sister Sue.

The scenes are well crafted and we understand the difficulties faced by the Hmong group with some cousins joining the local gang and trying to recruit Thao into it – in fact the criteria of admission was to steal Mark’s car, in which Thao failed.

When Mark, purely selfishly, drives the gang making a noise on his lawn – his property – he inadvertantly saves Thao from being bullied by the gang and the Hmongs are grateful.

There are funny scenes where he tries to communicate with the grandmother who does not speak a lick of English and where he is forcibly invited for a dinner party where he does not know how to socialize. They are all also realistic.

The Hmongs send Thao to a kind of penance for trying to steal his car, and Thao is inducted into repairing the house of an old lady living across the street, where Mark teaches him skills of repair. Mark also teaches him how to woo a pretty girl who he knows is interested in Thao and also teaches him ‘how to talk like a man to roughened and toughened men in the neighbourhood’. All these are natural and funny.

When the gang tries to interfere again, the ‘tough guy’ Mark goes to their house to warn them off, with unexpected and disastrous consequences.

Slowly he also gets close to the priest and “somewhat” close to his religion – even going so far to make a confession.

The story has some vibes of a rough man having a sweet interior – Things that we have seen many times, for example in The Despicable Me or Up. (Yes, I know that they are animated movies).

When the family next door faces retaliation where Thao is injured by a gunshot and that Sue is brutalized, he realizes that the time has come for him to set things right. He executes a perfectly planned solution.

The ending is really unexpected and we realize that he prepares for it with a good haircut and the above mentioned confession.

An excellent ending – a nice movie to watch.

7/10

= = Krishna

Movie : Train To Busan (2016)


This became famous all over the world, even before Pandemic won the Best Movie in Oscar and established South Korea as an entertainer who punches above its economic weight.

After resisting seeing a ‘zombie’ movie for quite a while, I was persuaded to see this and I am glad that I did. The contrast with The Walking Dead is clear. In that famous TV series also the zombie acopalypse is the backdrop but there the story is not about the zombies at all. They are there to provide a sense of menace in the environment in the background but it is all about how people behave when law and order breaks down and there is anarchy everywhere – caused by the zombies.

Here, though, the zombie problem is real and all the energy of the people who are still normal is expended in not falling prey to the increasing hordes of the zombies. And most of the action happens in a train.

The main focus of the story is on a father daughter duo. The stage is set for the spread of the problem in the first scene, where a truck driver finds out that there was a leak in a nuclear power plant but ‘everything is OK and it is being cleaned up’. When he hits a deer and drives away, it just gets up after being dead. The game is on.

The convenient source of a nuclear leak causing this is pure comic book logic but then who is looking for logic and reason in this movie that is there for the pure adrenalin inducing thrill ride?

Meanwhile, back to the father daughter duo. The father is a fund manager called Saek-Woo. Busy making money, he does not have enough time for his family, causing his wife to leave him. He has the daughter Su-An. He agrees to take his daughter to see her mother who lives in Busan.

Despite seeing several odd things – burning buildings, lots of emergency vehicles about in teh city – he goes to the station and boards the train. We get glimpses of what is going on as the train leaves the station and one man is brought down by what looks like a crazed person – a clever sneak peek of what is to come.

The train contains several other characters – a working class man Sang Hwa with his pregnant wife Seong-kyeong (yes, it rhymes, I noticed), a school group going for a baseball tournament (both boys and girls) and a tough CEO Yon-suk with a puffed up sense of self importance and utter lack of empathy, as it turns out.

As the train leaves, a lone woman manages to board it with a gash in her leg, and shortly after it manages to leave the platform, the guard on the station is overcome by a group of rabid humans – zombies. They miss the train just by seconds – or do they really?

The tension starts when the lone lady goes into convulsions – her eye colour changes remarkably – and then starts biting into fellow passengers who all go through the same conversion dance.

The rest of the story is all about the main group trying to stay one step ahead of the rampaging crowd of zombies who not only are trying to take over this train but also have taken over major cities and practically all of the country.

The movie is one nonstop thrill ride and the antics of the people who try to protect themselves is good. The character Sang-Hwa mixes humour with heroics to keep the momentum going.

If I am not to give away the ending, I perhaps should stop here. The movie is definitely worth watching, if you want a totally entertaining experience.

The only pity is that most of us cannot understand the language and so have to follow the story via the subtitles. Even so, it is a fun ride. Don’t look for any deep logic in it and just go for the ride.

Yes, there are mini lessons like how the busy Saek-Woo realizes that family is more important than making money and other small realizations of many of the characters.

A good romp if you are feeling in the mood for some mindless entertainment

6/10

= = Krishna

Movie: Shutter Island (2010)


Probably this review is coming when almost all of you have seen the movie but no matter.

If by any chance you have not seen the movie, I urge you to do so, just for the ending if nothing else.

The movie have some heavyweight actors : Leonardo Decaprio, Ben Kingsley and Mark Ruffalo. Each one has acted well and all three have lived their part, so the movie is very convincing all the way through.

The story keeps you on your toes right from the beginning. It follows two federal agents – Teddy Daniels (Leonardo) and his deputy Chuck Aule (Mark Ruffalo) go in a boat to Shutter Island. We learn that they are on a visit to an asylum for the criminally insane and they are going in order to investigate the escape of Rachel, an inmate, the night before. It is of utmost importance to find and take Rachel back due to the nature of the asylum. We learn that Teddy’s usual deputy was unavailable and Chuck joined him for this trip. They have not worked together before.

When they reach the island, the captain informs them that there is a big storm coming and that there would be no ferry service for a while. The asylum itself is guarded like a prison and we are told that it has Ward A for male patients and Ward B for female patients – from which Rachel escaped. The person who met them and gave this information is McPherson who is the deputy warden of the island. The chief of the asylum is Dr Cawley (Ben Kingsley).

McPherson also tells them that there is a Ward C for the most violent patients and due to security reasons, the deputies are forbidden from visiting this section, situated at the highest point of the island and is a converted fortress (and so fully secure) without either McPherson or Dr Cawley accompanying them.

When he asks them to hand over the weapons, Chuck protests and reminds them that he and Teddy are federal agents. However, they are told that they cannot enter the premises with weapons and relucatantly surrender their weapons.

Dr Cawley meets them and gives them an introduction of the facility. He says that there is a debate in the asylim as to whether the patients should be treated just with surgery (including lobotomy due to the violent nature) or with the latest psychotropic drugs which he, Dr Cawley, believes should be tried first on the patients.

Teddy complains of headache and the doctor provides him with some pills that he says are aspirin for the headache.

Rachel, the patient who escaped, Dr Cawley says just seems to have disappeared off the face of the island. She could not have gone anywhere but seems to have simply walked through the walls into thin air. She was admitted because she drowned her three children one by one and pretended that they were only sleeping. She was so far gone in delusion that she thought she was living in her home (in the island) and all the inmates were neighbours or serviceman like the postal worker.

When they are given the tour of the island, Teddy sees a lighthouse that is closed off and guarded by an armed guard and he is instantly suspicious.

They interview the staff and learn that Rachel was in group therapy the night before. She went back to her room after it ended and disappeared. In her room, under the floorboards, Teddy discovers a handwritten note that says ‘The law of 4. Who is 67?’

Teddy learns that the group therapy was led by a psychiatrist called Dr Sheehan. Teddy wants to interview him but is told that Dr Sheehan left in the ferry that returned from dropping them off and is off on a long vacation.

The story superbly builds up the tension and suspicion in order to deliver the knockout punch that would leave you gasping at the end. No, I am not going to give away the ending but it made waves when it came and even today packs a powerful punch.

Teddy’s (and your) suspicions are raised at this point, and he wonders how a physician was allowed to go on vacation just when one of the most dangerous patients had escaped the night before. What is really going on here?

Teddy’s background is introduced in a series of flashbacks – his history as a soldier in WW II and his work as a Federal agent. His loving wife, Dolores, we learn is dead but he feels she is still present to give him advise during critical moments of his life. Perhaps this is how he gets inspiration to think through complex issues. Even the flashbacks are visceral. He goes to Dachau concentration camp after the war came to an end and sees the miserable condition of dead Jews, whose bodies and bones are simply piled up. He is deeply affected by a lady in their midst, oblivious of all the gruesome misery around her, focused on the dead child she is cradling in her arms.

The scene with scattering ashes falling like snow is pure Scorsese, which adds considerable visual weight to the whole scene. Even flashbacks are not wasted in this film.

Dr Neahring, who is Dr Cawley’s boss, also happens to be visiting the asylum at the same time and Teddy dislikes him on site. The vague german accent triggers his memory of the Nazi atrocities. Dr Neahring does not help when he calls Teddy and Chuck as men of violence. He clarifies that they are not violent men but men who are used to be around violence and will not run away from danger.

When he says that the records of the patients requested by Teddy and Chuck cannot be released to them because the board of directors has forbidden providing access to any outsider, Teddy’s dislike boils over to rage and he threatens to abort the investigation and return in the morning, only to hand over the case to FBI, who have all the power to get the information they need.

Teddy and Chuck interview the patients but strangely, they seem to give just rehearsed answers. Chuck picks up on this right away when the answers to some questions are identical. But a patient distracts him (asking him to get her some water) and writes a note in his notebook when he is away.

It is lovely that Chuck calls Teddy ‘Boss’ all the time. When the next day they go exploring the island, Chuck asks Teddy to level with him and asks ‘Did a patient send you a secret message?’. Teddy shows him the notebook, where just one word is written : ‘RUN’.

Teddy gets to like Chuck as he works more with him and confesses that he has been trying actively to get this case assigned to him. Why? There is another inmate there called Laeddis who was a maintenance worker of the apartment where Chuck lived. He lit a fire in the apartment when Chuck was away and his wife Dolores died. He got off on a technicality but was arrested later for another murder and was sent here. When Teddy checked, there was no patient called Laeddis listed as an inmate in this asylum. Teddy knows that there is some bigger conspiracy going on here and had to find a case to come over and investigate.

He also tells Chuck about George Noyce, who has sent sometime here before being released and he intimated that there was some crazy research going on here, confirming his already growing suspicions.

Chuck wonders if they staged the disapparance of Rachel to draw him in here and asks him to be very careful.

McPherson comes across them and says that they were missing. They are now wet in the rain and when they are taken back, they are given a change of clothes – something that looks like the inmates dress but they are told that it is the uniform of the orderlies there.

When Teddy meets Dr Cawley, he argues with the doctor regarding the restrictions to his investigation. He suddenly gets a migraine again and refuses the pills given by Dr Cawley. Dr Cawley insists that he take them, and he complies, with misgivings. He then is taken to a lower room (cell) and falls asleep.

The next day the storm knocked out the power generator and the backup generator also failed. In the confusion, Teddy and Chuck manage to slink awaay and go into Ward C. There he meets a person who is sitting alone in a cell with his name as Laeddis. When Teddy confronts him, he finds that it is none other than George Noyce, who seems to be back on the island. George says that it is Teddy’s fault, because he kept asking him about Laeddis.

He says that Laeddis was indeed there, but was taken to the lighthouse to do lobotomy on him; that is where the strange experiments were being conducted on the patients.

Teddy and Chuck are told by Dr Cawley that Rachel has been found and he takes them to her cell. She, however, mistakes Teddy for her dead husband and starts yelling at him.

Chuck says that he managed to purloin Laeddis’ file but it has only the commitment papers of him. Now Teddy wants to go to the lighthouse and gets suspicious of Chuck when the latter tries to talk him out of it as a bad idea.

He leaves Chuck and goes exploring but when he is back, he only sees Chuck’s cigarette on the promontory. He thinks Chuck fell down dead and climbs down but reaches a cave midway when he sees light coming from there. He meets a woman with the knife. She is Rachel. She tells him that she was a doctor in the facility and found about their crazy experiments. When she threatened to expose them, they put her in a cell and concocted the story about her drowning her own kids.

She warns him that they will never let him leave either. They will concoct a story that he went crazy and lock him up. She asks him questions about him and says that they will use the trauma (his wife dying) as the cause of his going insane. She asked him not to take any medication they supplied (which he already had) and not to smoke any cigarettes they provided (which he had, from McPherson).

She says that the drugs take 36 to 48 hours to take effect and make him pliable to do their bidding. She also says that there will be tremors in his hand, which is a standard side effect – which he has.

Teddy then confronts Dr Cawley and says he is going back. He asks if they have seen Chuck. Dr Cawley says that he came to the island alone and that there was no deputy with him. Teddy realizes that they are putting their plan into action – the one Rachel had warned him about.

He is now determined to reach the lighthouse to the bottom of all this before it is too late. He creates a diversion and then outwits the guard and enters the lighthouse to see for himself.

The rest of the movie is the unexpected stuff so I will not go over those details.

Just let me say that the acting, the dialogs, the web of suspicion and misdirection, everything works great. You come away with the feeling that you have seen a great and satisfying movie.

The very end, that comes after the big reveal is also touching.

9/10

== Krishna

Movie: Knives Out (2019)


imageSpoiler Alert : I cannot review this without giving some of the twists away, so if you hate spoilers, please stop reading now (or at the end of the next paragraph)

 There is no dearth of stars here – You have Daniel Craig, Chris Evans, Jamie Lee Curtis, Christopher Plummer…. 

It is rare to see a pure murder mystery (in the style of the Agatha Christie’s stories) these days. In addition, this has the quirky comedy running right through it, with a little narrative style vaguely reminiscent of Malcolm In The Middle.

 

On the whole it makes for an entertaining mix. In addition to all of these, you have multiple surprises along the way. For instance, who would have imagined Chris Evans, that wholesome clean cut American hero, in not only the role of a good for nothing man but an evil one?

 

The surprise is compounded by encountering our James Bond, Daniel Craig, in the cerebral role of a detective Benoit Blanc (a la Hercule Poirot) and with a weird accent (not French, to my ears at least, as would be suggested by his name – nor Belgian French.

 

Some of the ‘detections’ are weird. Some of the actions of the people involved are very weird. But for all that, it is entertaining.

 

The movie starts with Harlan Thrombey, a famous author of crime (ironic, that!) novels calls his entire family to his mansion. The beginning scene shows the housekeeper Fran going upstairs with a polished tea set and finding him dead in his room. Christopher Plummer (remember his heydays in The Sound of Music?) does a credible job of a cantankerous old man who deliberately sets out to rub everyone the wrong way.

 

Benoit turns up there, almost uninvited, and starts kibbutzing in the police investigation but soon takes over the entire investigation. He reveals that he was hired anonymously through a letter which contained his retainer in cash and professes ignorance on who would have hired him.

 

Anyway, it turns out that the entire house had a motive in getting rid of him. His daughter was stealing money from him by getting him to send duplicate cheques for her daughter’s boarding school; Harlan threatened to cut off all allowances. His son in law, Richard, was cheating on his wife – Harlan’s daughter – and Harlan threatened to expose his perfidy to his daughter. Another son, who was his publisher was fired right in that party by Harlan and his livelihood threatened with ruin.

 

Not enough? Ransom, the grandson (played by Chris Evans) was told that Harlan had already cut him totally off in his will.

 

All the family seemed to have mooched off the wealth of the old man and so all of them were upset the night before Harlan’s death. A good set up on who did it, right? Albeit totally old fashioned.

 

The only persons who seem to be totally unperturbed by all this is an old lady who seems to not realize anything that is going on around her, and Marta, the caretaker of Harlan – she is a young lady of whom Harlan seems to be very fond of.

 

There is this absurd characteristic of Martha – like Pinoccio, who cannot lie without his nose growing longer, she cannot lie without throwing up. (Really?)

 

But unlike the Agatha Christie mysteries which this superficially resembles, we learn the cause of death through a memory of Marta. The previous night, Marta had taken tea to Harlan. They play Go and Harlan overturns the board (as he was losing), upsetting Marta and in her haste and confusion, she gives him an injection – instead of the regular dose, she manages to inject him with 100 ml of morphine, which is fatal to anyone, let alone a weak, feeble man like Harlan.

 

Harlan wants to help his murderess, and aks her to escape. His plan is for her to drive away in her car taking care to be observed, and then return through the trellis in the balcony. She then should wear Harlan’s coat and make herself visible, establishing her alibi. When she hesitates, he forces her hand by slitting his own throat. She complies. Then leaves the same stealthy way she came.

 

Problem solved, right? The movie should be over in about half an hour right? No, the story is only getting started.

 

Her interrogation with Blanc goes well, even though she has this puking problem because Benoit did not ask her any question, on which she had to lie outright.

 

Meanwhile, Benoit asks her to be her confidant (a la Hastings, another Poirot influenced feature) as she is ‘trustworthy’ and cannot lie. She starts obliterating tiny things which may have pointed to her as the murderer.

 

The next day Harlan’s will is read and in it is a shocker : Harlan has left everything in his will, including the house to Marta!! She is genuinely shocked.

However, the family is upset and luckily there is Ransom, who takes her in his car, away from the angry family. He seems amused by the whole flipside.

 

He takes her to a restaurant and after she eats her full, asks her what happened and how Harlan died. She cannot lie now and she tells him the truth.

 

She is now persuaded by Ransom to seek the truth, even if the police led by Benoit are pursuing her. First they go to the lab to find the toxicology report but find the whole lab burning.

 

Now she receives a note to meet at an unused building. However, when she goes there, she finds Fran, the housekeeper (who originally found Harlan’s body) dying of the same morphine overdose.

 

Marta does not want any more blood on her conscience and she gets Fran to the hospital by calling 911. She decides to confess all to the family and renounce her windfall.

 

However there is an abrupt twist. The problem with that is that they do not tell how Benoit figured it all out. He talks mystically of ‘a doughnut within a doughnut’ but for the life of me cannot figure out what the blather is all about.

 

Not only that; the harsh man Harlan, who is mean to everyone, helps Marta even when he realizes that she poisoned him. He abruptly cuts off everyone. I can go on and on.

 

It has the quirky side that is likable and an absurd side that can drive you nuts.

 

If you have the right attitude, you’d still enjoy the movie.

 

6/10

   – – Krishna

 

Movie: Freaks (2018)


imageThis is an interesting movie. A Canadian-American joint venture.

It starts out as something and then turns into something else. And then it turns again into something else.

 

The actors are relatively unknown but they do a good job on the film. As it starts, a small girl, Chloe, is warned by her father not to step outside as it is very dangerous. The father goes out to get all the essentials, leaving her alone, and the one time when she goes out he totally freaks out. She defies him of course and goes when he is not in – she is totally alarmed when he comes back once with a wound.

 

You think that this is an apocalyptic movie like I Am Mother and are waiting to see what would develop. But there are scenes where she sees other kids in the neighbourhood behaving normally and going out to buy ice cream in the van. Then you think that the father is a psycho.

 

Meanwhile we learn that her mother is dead and her father is the one looking after her. But bizarre scenes of a woman in chains keep appearing like a mirage in front of her.

 

Once when her dad is asleep (or away, I cannot remember which) she sneaks out after stealing some coins from the house and goes to buy ice cream and the man who sells ice cream convinces her to go with him. An old man and a creep? You wonder. Maybe here is the real story. But no. He claims to be her grandfather – her mother’s father and also claims that her mother is not dead but alive.

 

He wants to use Chloe’s powers to get the mother, who is the old man’s daughter, released.

 

And the real story comes out. These people are mutants, or ‘freaks’ who have special powers and are despised by and feared by the normal populace. Sounds familiar? Yes, this is the plot of X Men.

 

But here, the treatment is very different and the rest of the story deals with how the girl deals with the power and whether she can find and rescue her mother, against the wishes of the father who wants them to blend in and not use any special powers they may have.

 

She also comes across as a brat, wanting to stay with the normal people and hating his father for keeping her safe. She repeatedly steps into danger without realizing it or if she did, disregarding it.

 

The story gets real interesting when you realize what the special powers of hers is, and not only that, realizing that her entire family (father, grandfather – yes that creepy looking old man was really her grandpa – and mother ) have different powers (Now it begins to remind you of Incredibles).

 

All in all, an entertaining movie, with tension and plot twists and the evil authorities trying to hunt them down – yes, some section of the government wants to hunt them and kill them all, which is why the dad kept her hidden – and action galore.

 

Not the posh and pomp of the Disney superhero movies, and ideas copied from many other movies, but still it somehow works.

 

Enjoyable.

 

6/10

   – – Krishna

Movie: The Invisible Man (2020)


imageAn excellent thriller, with a twist near the end. (This seems to be the fashion nowadays).

 

The central role in the movie is that of Elizabeth Moss, who plays Cecilia Kass, the wife of a brilliant scientist Adrian Griffin. Even the titular villain is secondary to the story as the plot tightly follows, and revolves around, her. The one interesting tidbit is that she plays the mother of Homer Simpson Jr, the boy delivered by Simpson in an elevator – homer subsequently takes such a shine to the boy that he ignores his own children. Her other recent famous appearance is in The Handmaid’s Tale.

 

She has done well, but I cannot get used to the slightly crazed look she portrays throughout the movie. Yes, Cecelia is abused, as you learn later, and is terrified of her husband, but she acts as if she is half crazy most of the time. I don’t know, that takes away the sympathy factor for me.

 

The story is brilliantly told. Taut, straight narration, without a single frame more than what they need to tell you, it keeps your interest throughout.

 

One last factor, and we can move to the story itself. This is just based on the invisible man premise of HG Wells and has nothing to do with the classical story of the same name. They take the concept and spin a modern story suited to today’s time, completely disparate from the original classic.

 

And I don’t mean just a technology update. He is a brilliant scientist dealing in optics (and hence the possibility of invisibility – but don’t even get me started on the crude depiction of the invisibility suit and the scientific improbability of it) and they use cell phones and live in total modern luxury.

 

The movie starts well. We see her sneaking out of the house in the middle of the night – though she is totally inept at it, pausing to tell the dog ‘that she cannot take him along’ and kicking and making a ruckus, while the entire plan was to sneak away when the husband is asleep – helped by a sedative she had mixed in his drink.

 

Her sister comes and takes her away, but not before the husband sees all and nearly catches her at it. They escape by the proverbial skin of their teeth.

 

n the meanwhile, we learn that Adrian who wooed and married her, was very abusive to her and also would not let her separate from him when she proposed that idea.

 

She is stashed in the house of a policeman friend and her teenage daughter. Cecilia is afraid that the husband will find her no matter how well she is hiding and is even afraid to go out of the house to the post box. But one day, her sister turns up with the good news that her husband Adrian is dead that that Adrian’s brother, who was not on good terms with Adrian himself, has been named as the executor of the will.

 

Relieved that her nightmare is over, she gives her banking information for the transfer of the monthly proceeds, not realizing that she has given the one hint about her current whereabouts and strange things start happening. We see the knife she used to cut the vegetables suddenly disappear. She then faces a bizarre set of events, where her comforter is pulled off when she sleeps and when she tries to retrieve it, it will not move and what’s more, the shape of a shoeprint is on it briefly.

 

Also when she goes with her portfolio (she is an artist) to show an interviewer, she finds her briefcase empty. All this is a danger sign to her and she suspects that her husband is not dead and what is more, is stalking her invisibly. We also learn from her husband’s brother that Adrian was obsessed with getting her back because in his entire life, she was the only one who did not want him or his money and he can’t have that.

 

A number of thrilling instances follow where she finds that the stepdaughter of her friend suddenly slapped and the stepdaughter and the friend suspect her of violence and want her out of the house. Her sister slams the door on her as ‘she’ wrote an email to the sister accusing her of gold digging (with her).

 

Knowing that something is off, she discovers (when she suspects her of being stalked) with a judicious use of paint that her husband is stalking her in an invisibility suit. She then manages to escape from the house and in a cab goes back to her husband’s mansion. Accidentally, she discovers an invisibility suit he is making and stashes it away. As she is about to leave, an invisible man attacks her but her dog comes and intervenes, giving her time to escape.

 

She calls her sister to a restaurant to apologize but – let me not give all the spoiler details here – ends up in jail accused of murder.

 

How she fights an invisible enemy who is smart, has limitless resources and is invisible forms the rest of the story.

 

A great story but you can pick a million holes in it. She knows her husband faked her death but no explanation is given as to how. The only explanation is Cecelia’s statement that ‘He is very bright. He could fake his death easily’. Also the same explanation for ‘How he was found bound in his own basement’ when a man in an invisibility cloak was killed and turned out to be the ‘wrong man’.

 

For all that, the imagination is great and especially the visuals when the suit malfunctions is done very well.

 

The ending of how she outfoxes her opponent is also told well.

 

A good movie to watch if you are not worried about the scientific validity of the cloak and if you are willing to overlook events with no explanations.

 

6/10

     – – Krishna

Movie : Hush (2016)


imageThis is a horror film in the mould of a killer tormenting a girl with a disability. It has been done before, from way back when – Audrey Hebpurn’s Wait Until Dark is an example.

 

In this case, the story is tense and so compelling that two Indian films have been done as a remake – The Tamil film Kolaiyudhir Kaalam and the Hindi film Khamoshi.

 

This is the story of one day in the life of a deaf woman Maddie who lives alone in a remote location. The film opens with her neighbour Sarah (this being American suburbia, she lives quite a distance away) visiting her. We learn that Maddie lost her hearing in her childhood due to a botched operation after Meningitis and that she wants to be an author. She also says that she has ideas with various scenes always running in her head and she chooses one that is appropriate. Of course all this has relevance for later.

 

Sarah came to return a book Maddie had lent her and then she goes off. Maddie tries to write some more of the story but is hungry. As she is cooking, Sarah runs to the French window, and we see a masked man pursuing her and he kills her as she raps on the window for help. He realizes from Maddie’s total lack of reaction that she is deaf and decides that there is an easy kill waiting there too. (I don’t think they either explained who the killer is and why he was trying to kill Sarah, or else I was not paying enough attention. We have to assume that he is a crazed psychopathic serial killer)

 

We see that Sarah has a cat (we already feel sorry for it since we know what happens in these kind of movies to small animals) and the door is left open for it to go and come when it pleases. The killer decides to have some fun with her. He comes in, steals her cell and then takes some pictures of her from behind. He then goes out and sends her the picture. She now knows there is someone stalking her. He ostenteously slashes the tires of her car in full view so that she cannot escape.

 

Maddie writes on the window that she has not seen his face (as he is masked) and that she will not say anything – she does not yet know her friend was killed. An intelligent move in this kind of a movie. He then simply takes the mask off and shows her his face. She now knows that he will not leave without killing her now.

 

She is a very spirited woman and then distracts him by throwing a metal object from the roof and then try to escape the other way. She is unfortunately seen by the killer who climbs up the roof and shoots her in the leg with an arrow from the crossbow he has with him. She, however, manages to knock him off and escapes back inside, with the crossbow.

 

With her leg hampered and with her disability and with blood loss, we think that she is done.

 

Then John, the boyfriend of Sarah shows up. He is a burly man, and the killer in a blue uniform like dress pretends to be a policeman. However, Sarah’s ear ring, fallen on the ground alerts John to the fact that something is wrong. As he plays it cool and says that the key is under a big boulder, Maddie inadvertantly distracts him from inside her house porch, allowing the killer to stab him with a knife and John simply bleeds to death before the horrified eyes of Maddie.

 

The whole movie is a cat and mouse game of a gritty and determined Maddie pitted against a cunning killer. She repeatedly gets battered and escapes by the skin of her teeth. The movie is tense right up to the end.

 

All ends well and (hope this is not a spoiler for you), the cat is found safe too.

 

Great movie, nice to watch and a good entertainer, even if the plot has been seen multiple times before.

 

8/10

    – – Krishna

Movie : Edge of Darkness (2010)


imageIt could have been a good movie but a whole lot of plot strings are twisted into confusing strands and so you really don’t know what they are trying to say. Some of it is to provide twists in the movie that makes you go ‘Ah, I did not see that coming’ but it is too complex that it takes away, at least for me, from the pleasures of seeing a simple tale unfold. There are also sudden twists that really make you go, ‘Hm that is totally out of character for this person’.

 

Mel Gibson does his part as he normally does, in his usual style, and you get a sense of the actor in the part, and not the living character as some method actors are capable of conjuring up.

 

Now for the story. Mel plays Thomas Craven. He has lost his wife and his grown up daughter lives apart and there seem to be a distance between them. At the start of the movie, he picks her up and she seems preoccupied. She suddenly gets a nosebleed, asks dad to ignore it and violently throws up. The terrified dad takes her to the front door, meaning to take her to the hospital only to be met by a masked man who cries his name loudly before shooting – killing the daughter instead.

 

A totally broken Thomas and the police department think it is an accident that the daughter got killed as Thomas, a detective, has made many enemies in his work. But he discovers his daughter had packed a gun for the visit and begins to now think that his daughter may have been the real target and sets out to investigate, against the advice of the police colleagues to rest and recuperate mentally.

 

His investigations yield results. He discovers that the gun belonged to Emma’s boyfriend. The boyfriend admits that Emma was disturbed about illegal nuclear firearms Northmoor, the company she worked for was making to export to foreign countries to make ‘dirty bombs’. When she tried to expose the company clandestinely with the help of some activists, she was poisoned by the company. Hence the nosebleed (really?) and the hard vomiting.

 

He meets Jedburgh, a ‘consultant’ sent to stop him from exposing the company secrets but who understands the anguish of the father and leaves him alone for a while.

 

He tracks the killing to Jack Bennett, the head of Northmoor, and then finds out evidence that the bodyguards of the head were the ones who killed his own daughter. He violently (he is Mel Gibson after all) tracks down and kills them.

 

Meanwhile, Jack, fearing that he is losing control of his secret, manages to poison Thomas with Thallium, a radioactive poison – using the same poison and the same method (mixing it in milk in a carton) that they used against the daughter earlier.

 

What follows is an action scene with violence galore. Thomas manages to kill Bennett but we realize that the rot goes higher to the Senator. Thomas is in the hospital, sick.

 

The senator gets killed unexpectedly by an unexpected person with a lame excuse as to why.

 

Powerful, but confusing.

 

I will leave it at that. It has a mixed up plot – some scandal, some cover ups, some righteous indignation, some misdirection.

 

An OK show, I guess.

 

5/10

     – – Krishna